Applying the Principles of Governing Law in International Commercial Arbitration: Practical Considerations for Parties and Arbitrators

Applying the Principles of Governing Law in International Commercial Arbitration: Practical Considerations for Parties and Arbitrators

Governing law in international arbitration
Governing law in international commercial arbitration is a topic that has sparked considerable debate and controversy within the legal community. With the increasing globalization of business transactions, the need for a unified approach to governing law has become paramount. In international commercial arbitration, parties from different countries come together to resolve their disputes through a private and neutral forum. Therefore, the choice of governing law plays a crucial role in determining the rights and obligations of the parties involved. It provides clarity and predictability, ensuring that the parties understand the rules that will govern their contractual relationship. Choosing the governing law in a commercial contract requires careful consideration. There are several factors that parties must take into account, such as the nature of the transaction, the location of the parties, and the legal systems involved. Each jurisdiction has its own set of laws and regulations that may significantly impact the outcome of a dispute. One approach to governing law is party autonomy. This principle allows the parties to freely choose the law that will govern their contract. Party autonomy reflects the desire to maintain control over the arbitration process and ensures that the parties’ intentions are respected. It allows the parties to select a law that they are familiar with or believe will best suit their needs. However, the principle of party autonomy is not absolute. There are limitations imposed by national laws, international treaties, and public policy considerations. For example, if the chosen governing law violates mandatory provisions of a particular jurisdiction, the court may refuse to apply it. Therefore, parties must be mindful of the limitations when exercising their right to choose the governing law. Another approach to governing law is the closest connection test. This test focuses on the law that has the closest connection to the contract and the parties involved. It takes into account factors such as the place of performance, the nationality or domicile of the parties, and the place of business. The closest connection test aims to promote fairness and equity by selecting a law that is closely linked to the dispute. The arbitration agreement itself can also have an impact on the governing law. Most arbitration agreements include a clause specifying the governing law that will be applied to the substantive issues of the dispute. This clause can be a standalone provision or incorporated into the governing law clause. Parties should carefully draft the arbitration agreement to avoid any ambiguity or confusion regarding the governing law. In addition to the governing law, parties should also consider the impact of conflict of laws rules. Conflict of laws rules determine which jurisdiction’s law will apply in situations where there is a conflict between the laws of different jurisdictions. These rules can vary significantly depending on the legal systems involved. Therefore, it is essential for parties to understand the conflict of laws rules of the chosen governing law. In conclusion, the choice of governing law in international commercial arbitration is a complex and contentious issue. It requires careful consideration and analysis of various factors, including party autonomy, the closest connection test, and conflict of laws rules. Parties should seek legal advice and consider the specific circumstances of their contract before making a decision. Ultimately, the goal is to choose a governing law that provides certainty, predictability, and fairness for all parties involved.
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *